Just finished a build for a gent using the new GPA 604-III's, with the stock GPA x-over.
The client is very happy with the mids and high frequency...but feels the bass is lacking.
The units sit in large 240 litres Stonehenge V boxes, double walled ply, with three internal walls damped.
To bring up the bass, should I just add a simple attenuator, say, for the HF?
Would bi-amping be a better path to follow?
Other suggestions appreciated.
Todd, if you see this - any response?
Andrew
Got any pics of the backside? is there a shelf or anything? How did you know my name was Todd? lol
Pics to follow.
No shelf as I used double walled ply throughout. Very heavy cabinets.
Todd = Tod White!!
Kind regards.
Pic of back panel. approx 30 screws to secure. Inside back panel also lined with sound deadening. (1/2 inch rubber ribbed carpet underlay.)
Hey there - sorry I haven't responded sooner. I was in a car wreck a couple of weeks ago and am trying to catch up.
The III is extremely well behaved, especially in that box. It's hard to tell from the picture, but you may not have enough bracing inside. My design calls for a front-to-back brace in the form of an "H" that is secured underneath the woofer hole and connects to the back of the cabinet. You may be spending a lot of LF energy wiggling the box.
What other items are in your system?
Todd W. White, Owner & Webmaster
Altec Lansing's (unofficial) Homepage
Hi Todd
Sorry about the car wreck. At least you might get an upgrade?!
I'm reporting on this issue all second hand. The guy is comparing his Tannoy co-axes with the 604s...so I don't know what box he is comapring to...maybe a GRF horn. For amp, I think he was using a KT66 or 88's...not sure if SET or PP.
When I had the boxes before sending off, we had a good demo night with some qualified audio buddies. They loved the sound, as did I. In fact, given the US dollar value to AUD, I'd like to buy a pair for myself!
I note your comment on the brace. If the walls are double lined (38mm in total), wouldn't this negate the need for the brace?
You say, You may be spending a lot of LF energy wiggling the box.. What do you mean?
I had also asked about a simple attenuator switch for the HF. Is this do-able and would you recommend it? alternatively, would you recommend by-amping...using a bigger amp to drive the LF's?
Kind regards.
When I read "bass is lacking" it does not sound like a problem that can be sured by turning down the horn. But one man's bass is another's midrange.
Since your crossover is up above 1Khz, I don't think that turning down the horn will bring up the bass, it will just dull the overall sound. However, there does need to be an adjustment on the horn to suite the room, amp and listener. That "may" be enough.
Getting "bass is lacking" 3rd hand is tough. We don't really know what the tonal balance is. If it truly is lacking low bass, then GM's BSC is needed. My 1st guess would be a BSC circuit of 11mH+175uF (in parallel) in series with the woofer. You'll need to turn down the horn to compensate. And maybe a tube amp for lower damping factor - fuller bass.
Like everything else in life - "It Depends".
Vintage style woofers like Altec with a low Qts can sound dry and thin in the bass dept if driven with modern solid state amps. Those amps are too highly damped for the already highly damped (low Q) vintage systems. A tube amp with its much higher output impedance lets the woofer "run loose" a little, providing more bass. Most of the vintage drivers and boxes were designed with this in mind.
Put a high damping factor SS amp on them and they will sound bass shy.
Our own GM has been telling folks this for years, but mostly he gets ignored.
More modern speaker designs do better with modern style solid state amps.
Posting Permissions
Originally Posted by Panomaniac
Is this wrong ? Is my understanding of it flawed ? Thanks !
Bookmarks